-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 11/25/2015 09:14 AM, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:

> Afaict the real problem is that the functional approach is slightly
> broken here (being functional is fine, just the implementation is
> broken). The attempt to build bar _had_ a result. That result was a
> build failure and as such it should be explicitly represented in
> the store such that when another attempt to build bar comes along,
> the result is already known: build failure. And this should make
> the build of foo2 fail immediately, too, since one of its
> dependencies failed to build.

Actually it seems I just misinterpreted my observations. Never mind
the noise :)

Flo

- -- 
https://fps.io
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWVXEpAAoJEA5f4Coltk8ZFgQH/R4XwG1XPKh+dEHHw83guZTh
bd2QfkYT3MZiFIu/JVcIbXqT04Kgqn663kqgDd9vQCG52DK0EA/fdEKiSqbKdAy0
+XS+JpnXecqsT3mLGCqdU/3khY+IzfvIkRuHofR5x8HGSQ10PYqGiHZwA8Guuwz6
PgTYWn2pd9TPO9YMemK1gsHtSEbwcMOih10qoOyThKMgmj63dEY7GK/eKTLakEpR
g/h2KUlblIV46p0j0hdkmLIMxHYZvJphCJTu9R0V8uW5INta1M1MI4QhvvVGmto8
l517JiGX1H3eaLo18B2xdOhQnQbjWF4XSEAh5Ps+pmw0syHZrEEeGTVSNtXW6L8=
=P5YV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to