-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/02/2015 05:12 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> If there are other ways we can recognize people's work, we should > consider them :) Think of it this way though, a packager is a > person who packages. The value is in the verb, not the noun; > packaging is an ongoing process. We should reward the process, via > NEWS, and perhaps in other ways. > > Besides, no one wants to be the person that removes a name from a > list of a package's packagers! Why remove a name that made it into the list ever? Did the package packagers package packages somewhere in the past or didn't they (or contributed to packaging packages - contest: What sentence can include the most occurences of "package" and still make sense)? Like I said in the other reply: It's just a proposal to ponder a bit. Maybe it does make sense, maybe it doesn't. To me it still seems it does .. Flo - -- https://fps.io -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWXzvLAAoJEA5f4Coltk8ZHTwIALSvOUmeZysjHbu9TDM8z7LK KFMJIlf0fe7bmVn/O8ynTiKbPHS3MF9xmNBADPdilQ/dIs7AgZkvaoQxoIogTFjP ImM1HFiaTV1RagRv+0f+zKD3s16+duDtBKEdu5wcIUVtOl1pmtaO8sNeXLvRnjFB ZTUxqy/s4/OhsH3XA/IbbXBUc/9uzgunNynQTAyakXvH3VhOdj1jFQxaMU4EfcwI aF3Q9TVJDAw3kGH6r8eKXLte90d2GZpScNCZ7PSN1KOkYjao3QBoKDyn/jD57wbv Uf3N245gf55BAj38LCe64O3gXbgT4TNiCWeRMMJ5gPuyF4QYPzXudDEQ8vyc9+c= =4e0U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
