On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the > > website > > was that we have lowered requirements for what we're looking for in armhf > > build machines, at least in terms of RAM. In terms of freedom the Raspberry > > Pi 2 isn't great, but in terms of cost its pretty inexpensive. Is this > > something we'd be interested in? > > We are waiting for two new Novena boards that should arrive before the > end of the year. The current bottleneck is not the build machines, but hydra; > already now the build farm could sustain more jobs in parallel, but we > artificially limit them. So I would say that there is currently no need > to add more build machines. This may change if we get a physical machine > for hydra.
What sort of machine would be appropriate for hydra? > Andreas > >
