>From 72e065fc7c8012508ee8ac2963ac25a7c173d33f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:15:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add libconfig.
* gnu/packages/textutils.scm (libconfig): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/textutils.scm | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/textutils.scm b/gnu/packages/textutils.scm
index e020290..2aa8615 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/textutils.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/textutils.scm
@@ -179,3 +179,25 @@ the Hannon Lab.")
"CityHash provides hash functions for strings. The functions mix the
input bits thoroughly but are not suitable for cryptography.")
(license license:expat))))
+
+(define-public libconfig
+ (package
+ (name "libconfig")
+ (version "1.5")
+ (source (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append
+ "http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/libconfig-";
+ version ".tar.gz"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "1xh3hzk63v4y8815lc5209m3s6ms2cpgw4h5hg462i4f1lwsl7g3"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (home-page "http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/";)
+ (synopsis "C/C++ configuration file library")
+ (description
+ "Libconfig is a simple library for manipulating structured configuration
+files. This file format is more compact and more readable than XML. And
+unlike XML, it is type-aware, so it is not necessary to do string parsing in
+application code.")
+ (license license:lgpl2.1+)))
--
2.5.0
Hello Ricardo,
Thank you for your quick response.
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Roel,
>
>> From a21ebd71a39bf5000e5809514f0e00185311795d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Roel Janssen <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:45:47 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add libconfig.
>
>> * gnu/packages/libconfig.scm: New file.
>> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
>
> I have an irrational desire to group similar package expressions in
> modules rather than to add new modules. In this case we have
> “textutils.scm” and “xml.scm” that seem related.
>
> Someone else should say whether a new module for this is better than
> grouping it with one of the above modules. If a new module is indeed
> warranted the commit message is perfect.
Sorry about creating yet another file. I looked at filenames to find a
place to put this in, but I hadn't looked careful enough it seems. I
think this fits in 'textutils.scm' indeed. The updated version of the
patch should be better.
>> +(define-public libconfig
>> + (package
>> + (name "libconfig")
>> + (version "1.5")
>> + (source (origin
>> + (method url-fetch)
>> + (uri (string-append
>> + "http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/libconfig-";
>> + version ".tar.gz"))
>> + (sha256
>> + (base32
>> + "1xh3hzk63v4y8815lc5209m3s6ms2cpgw4h5hg462i4f1lwsl7g3"))))
>> + (build-system gnu-build-system)
>> + (home-page "http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/";)
>> + (synopsis "C/C++ configuration file library")
>> + (description
>> + "Libconfig is a simple library for manipulating structured
>> configuration
>> +files. This file format is more compact and more readable than XML. And
>> +unlike XML, it is type-aware, so it is not necessary to do string parsing in
>> +application code.")
>> + (license license:lgpl2.1)))
>
> The license is actually “lgpl2.1+” because the file headers say this:
>
> “either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later
> version.”
You're right. I updated the patch.
Hopefully I haven't screwed up the commit message. :)
Thanks,
Roel
