On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:58:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > So, in the future we should probably > package espeak-ng as well, for the sake of users that need speech > synthesis. It will conflict with espeak since the output binaries have > the same names.
>From what you write, would it not be better to directly package espeak-ng and to drop espeak? Andreas
