Fabian Harfert <[email protected]> writes:

> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:08:21 +0100
> Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fabian,
>> 
>> I wonder if this will work out of the box.  Where does GTK+ look for
>> engines?  Was the patch enough to GTK+ to make it respect
>> GUIX_GTK2_PATH and GUIX_GTK3_PATH?
>> 
>> Or will we need to add some additional procedure to building profiles
>> to generate a cache or a list of engines expected by GTK+?  (I know
>> that at least for input method modules something like that will be
>> needed.)
>> 
>> ~~ Ricardo
>> 
>
> Hi!
>
> Because the gtk-xfce-engine from xfce.scm doesn't need this I thought
> that this is the case for these engines, too. But really, I don't know
> how this is handled. If I install the package to my profile, which is
> included in the GUIX_GTK2_PATH, they are found by Gtk+.
Yes, the engines can be found by GUIX_GTK2_PATH, but I think the themes
need manually link to ~/.themes.

I replace 'Gtk+ 2' with 'GTK+ 2.x', and add a copyright header for you.
Patches pushed, thanks!

Reply via email to