On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 09:50:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > Maybe Ruby is easier though. Simply replace the foo in require 'foo' > with the first input where > /gnu/store/.../lib/ruby/gems/2.2.0/gems/.../lib/foo.rb is a file, I > think. Presumably the reality will be more complex, but does this > sound bad Pjotr?
I can't oversee what it means to Guix. Traversing all the files would take some logic... But I don't think it is necessary. If the gem load path is correct there should be no real issues. Main problem is the shared profile between rubies and gems. See my previous E-mail in this thread. Pj.
