Mathieu Lirzin (2016-03-05 02:03 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Mathieu Lirzin (2016-02-29 03:28 +0300) wrote: >> >> [...] >>> I have left the emacs interface untouched. >> >> Hm, I wonder why? You already had the required changes in your initial >> patch. Anyway, I'm attaching the patch with these changes. The only >> difference from your original patch is replacing 'package-full-name' >> with 'make-package-specification' in "guix-main.scm". > > The concern of backward compability that Ludo raised, have made the work > more challenging than changing things in place. As a consequence it was > not clear to me what should/can change or not. To keep my mind clear, I > have decided to leave the emacs part unchanged. So the true reason is > exhaustion. :)
Fair enough! And thanks for your work, now you are a very knowledgeable person in this "name@version" part of code! -- Alex
