I have observed that package imagemagick, has license specified in the definition as: FSF-free, even though I see on the website that they use Apache 2.0 license.
It is better that correct license is specified in the package definition. Jean Louis
I have observed that package imagemagick, has license specified in the definition as: FSF-free, even though I see on the website that they use Apache 2.0 license.
It is better that correct license is specified in the package definition. Jean Louis