Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: >> Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> writes: >> >> > Strangely enough, I couldn't apply it either. I don't know what >> > happened.. I regenerated the patch, and now I was able to apply it to >> > my source tree. Hopefully it works for you too now. >> >> This problem has already happened to me last year. I suspect it is/was a >> bug in Git. > > I've attached the diffoscope report (HTML) between the first two patches > in this thread.
Do you mean “attached” like in email attachment? If so then I don't see the attachment... > The diff header in the 'bad' patch says that the hunk applies to 7 > lines. In the 'good' patch, the header instead says 6. > > The 'bad' patch can be applied when that parameter is changed to 6. > > I wonder if the bug can be reproduced? That would be great. :) -- Mathieu Lirzin
