Cyril Roelandt (2016-04-28 05:25 +0300) wrote: > * guix/packages.scm (package-full-name): Use '@' instead of '-'. > --- > guix/packages.scm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm > index d62d1f3..e33791e 100644 > --- a/guix/packages.scm > +++ b/guix/packages.scm > @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ name of its URI." > > (define (package-full-name package) > "Return the full name of PACKAGE--i.e., `NAME-VERSION'." > - (string-append (package-name package) "-" (package-version package))) > + (string-append (package-name package) "@" (package-version package))) > > (define (%standard-patch-inputs) > (let* ((canonical (module-ref (resolve-interface '(gnu packages base))
I recall it was intentionally left untouched. I don't remember details but search for 'package-full-name' here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00910.html Mathieu or Ludovic should know better. -- Alex
