Ben Woodcroft <[email protected]> writes: > On 28/04/16 21:56, Ben Woodcroft wrote: >> >> >> On 28/04/16 16:27, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> Ben Woodcroft <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> On 28/04/16 15:19, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>>>> Rob Syme <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/ruby-symlinkfix.patch: New patch to fix >>>>>> issue #1448. >>>>>> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby): Update to 2.3.1 including symlink >>>>>> patch. >>>>> Thank you! The patch also needs to be registered in >>>>> dist_patch_DATA in >>>>> “gnu/local.mk”. I can do this later when applying the patch in the >>>>> office, unless there are other objections to this patch. >>>> Do you mind holding off for a bit (no more than ~10 hours)? I wouldn't >>>> mind having a play with this myself. >>> No problem. I can also apply this tomorrow if your tests find no >>> problems. Thanks! >> >> Ruby-hashery now fails a unit test, but since that is a higher level >> package and ruby-ansi works I think it might be good to apply the >> patch here anyway. Would you mind please? > > I've just pushed a slightly modified version of Rob's patch and a patch > for ruby-hashery to master; I believe all the packages in > gnu/packages/ruby.scm build now.
Thanks Ben, and thanks Rob for the patch! ~~ Ricardo
