Ben Woodcroft <[email protected]> skribis: > On 06/03/2016 06:14 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...] >> I think the downside is that the GitHub updater won’t be able to >> identify these, although I’m not 100% sure of that. > > I haven't actually tested but I would think that is right > Ludo. Indeed: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix upstream) scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix import github) scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(gnu packages emacs) scheme@(guile-user)> (package-update-path emacs-smex (list %github-updater)) $2 = #f scheme@(guile-user)> ((upstream-updater-latest %github-updater) emacs-smex) $3 = #f scheme@(guile-user)> ((upstream-updater-predicate %github-updater) emacs-smex) $4 = #f --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > However, I expect this issue is solvable with modifications to the > GitHub updater. Yeah, we should probably do it eventually. Thanks for your feedback, Ludo’.
