On 2016-06-17(01:43:02-0400), Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:02:44PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Efraim Flashner <[email protected]> skribis: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:40:47AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:53:28PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > >> > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgcrypt): Update to 1.7.1 > > >> > > >> This looks good to me. What branch should it go on? > > >> > > > > > > either core-updates or core-updates-next > > > > The latter please. :-) > > Okay, in that case, can you rebase it on core-updates, ng0? Otherwise is > won't apply cleanly due to trying to upgrade from 1.6.5 instad of 1.7.0. >
This should be relatively easy when I have the gnupg branch still around, otherwise I'll recreate it. With the wording familiar to me yet sometimes not good to comprehend even when I hear and parse it correctly when talking: I should rebase the commit on the branch `core-updates` which currently is at version 1.6.5? -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on psyced.org / loupsycedyglgamf.onion
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
