l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 06:27:12PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: >>> Indeed. After disabling this one test, the package builds on my mips >>> machine. >>> I pushed and will start a new evaluation of core-updates. >> >> Drawback: This essentially recompiles all of core-updates. > > Not OK. > >> If we consider mips64el as a "release critical" architecture in Debian >> parlance, I would say we have no choice. Otherwise, we could also >> revert my commit and merge core-updates now. > > What about reverting, and instead modifying in a mips64el conditional? > As in: > > (arguments > `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases > ,@(if (string-prefix? "mips64el" (%current-system)) > '((add-before 'check 'disable-the-thing …)) > '()) > …)))
I pushed something along these lines as 8b732bf6d93ad2cb529c3c5f886efe2625c5fb72, and also canceled the previous evaluation builds and started a new evaluation. Hopefully that will allow us to merge core-updates more quickly! Ludo’.
