Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes: > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes: > >> Ludo', >> >> On 2016-07-19 23:00, l...@gnu.org wrote: >>> Applied, thanks! >> >> Thanks! I didn't know about @example. >> >> It seems like some Texinfo syntax is encouraged (like @command), but >> not the full set (package descriptions are full of abbreviations, >> but no @abbr or @acronym anywhere). Is this by design? > > Nope it is not by design, the Guile (texinfo ...) modules just don't > implement these commands from GNU Texinfo, but should indeed. > > -- > Mathieu Lirzin >
Is there a feature request / bug we could file somewhere on this? I don't know what the upstream of Guile texinfo is, but it reads like it should be extended. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org