Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes:

> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes:
>
>> Ludo',
>>
>> On 2016-07-19 23:00, l...@gnu.org wrote:
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks! I didn't know about @example.
>>
>> It seems like some Texinfo syntax is encouraged (like @command), but
>> not the full set (package descriptions are full of abbreviations,
>> but no @abbr or @acronym anywhere). Is this by design?
>
> Nope it is not by design, the Guile (texinfo ...) modules just don't
> implement these commands from GNU Texinfo, but should indeed.
>
> -- 
> Mathieu Lirzin
>

Is there a feature request / bug we could file somewhere on this? I
don't know what the upstream of Guile texinfo is, but it reads like it
should be extended.
-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org

Reply via email to