Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:12:34AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: >> Hi Danny, >> >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:51:10AM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >> > ldc fails because they do >> > ::isnan >> > which is a bad idea if isnan is a C macro (which it usually isn't - but >> > hey O_o). I've substituted >> > isnan >> > for it and this part then compiles fine. >> > This fix is not safe in general because if there's a method called isnan >> > in scope, it will use that. In the ldc case, they've named the method >> > "isNan" - so it's fine. >> >> did you forget to add a patch? >> >> Anyway, they made a release 1.0.0. Maybe it would be preferable to try >> an update of the package first, in case the problem is already solved >> on their side? > > I prefer this approach. Always try to take upstream's solution :)
I prefer getting this version in first too. We need to bootstrap 1.0.0 from the 0.1.x one, so this is a welcome upgrade :-).
