Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes:
> iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes:
>
>> ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think it's pointless to have a suckless.scm which bundles all software
>>> which just happens to follow suckless ideology/goals or be hosted
>>> there.
>>> That's why I did not commit ii to suckless but to irc.scm, no one will
>>> look into suckless.scm when what they really are looking for is not
>>> $suckless but application xy.
>>> I try to unbundle and remove suckless.scm with the next patches.
>>
>> Well, it's difficult to choose the "right" category for packages.
>> For example, 'dmenu' shouldn't go to 'wm.scm', it has nothing to
>> do with window managers.
>>
>> When a project makes multiple softwares, I think it's easier to
>> put all of them in one project file, eg: gnome and freedesktop.
>
> So you are in favour of keeping (gnu packages suckless)?
Fwiw, I'm in favor of keeping suckless.scm, and rejecting these proposed
package moves.
Mark
