Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
> What was the rationale for commit ae3bded, which downgraded the gnupg > version used by gpgme from gnupg-2.1 to gnupg-2.0? 2.1 was labeled as “modern”, which I thought meant “experimental”; probably that was that sort of rationale… > My reading of gpgme's NEWS makes me suspect that gnupg-2.1.x is not only > supported, but likely to be a superior choice. NEWS includes: > > * More precise error codes are returned if GnuPG >= 2.1.8 is used. > * Fixed regression for GPGSM use with GnuPG < 2.1. > > If there's a reason to stick with gnupg-2.0 for gpgme, it might be good > to add a comment to explain why. > > What do you think? I think you agree: we should upgrade to 2.1 here and elsewhere (though some external programs such as Pius cannot deal yet with 2.1, so we need to be careful.) Thanks, Ludo’.
