On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:33:15PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > +(define-public openssl-1.0.2i > > Should this be kept private? Otherwise, both patches look good to me, > please push.
Good catch. I also realized that these patches change what variable is used when using 'openssl' with the Guix command-line tools. Without these patches, `guix build openssl` uses (@@ (gnu packages tls) openssl-next) [0] With these patches, `guix build openssl` uses (@@ (gnu packages tls) openssl-1.0.2i) So, I put (replacement #f) in openssl-next, which restores the old behavior. We don't want to replace openssl-next with openssl-1.0.2i. Pushed HEAD to 163d93a6bd231596959e2e157b60eb964db85d04 [0] Is that the right way to describe a package variable? That's how I use `guix build -e`.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
