Amirouche Boubekki <[email protected]> skribis: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:46 PM Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Amirouche, > > > [...] > > >> >> + (scm-files (string-split >> "bytestructures/guile/explicit-endianness.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-metadata.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/ffi.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/vector.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/union.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-all.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/utils.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/pointer.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/base.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/struct.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile/bitfields.scm >> >> +bytestructures/r6/bytevectors.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/base.syntactic.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/explicit-endianness.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/vector.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/union.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/utils.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/base.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/numeric.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/struct.scm >> >> +bytestructures/body/bitfields.scm >> >> +bytestructures/guile.scm" >> >> Please let’s not list all the files. :-) Could it instead use >> something like (find-files "bytestructures" "\\.scm$")? >> > > The above is a subset of all files. Do you prefer to use `find-files` and > exclude some files?
Whichever is the most concise and most maintainable approach (I suspect it’s ‘find-files’ + exclude specific files.) Ludo’.
