Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:16:24AM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote: >> Hi Leo, >> >> I've responded to the feedback from you, Hartmut, and John. How does >> the latest patch look? It's available here: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg00707.html > > Thanks for the reminder! I pushed as > 426e6083ae9d4569005dab8edf948485e5979171. > > I think it would be useful to figure out if it's possible to avoid the > wrapper somehow, but I didn't look into this closely.
I'm sure we could avoid the wrapper by patching the source, but why would that be better? The wrapper is a simple and robust solution, and in this case I can't see any drawbacks to using it. For context, Asunder assumes that various tools will be made available via the PATH environment variable. It refuses to function in certain cases when a tool that it needs can't be found in the PATH. I'm sure we could patch this mechanism, but it seems simpler to just create a wrapper that puts the directories containing the tools onto the PATH. -- Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
