Hi,

Am 30.01.2017 um 10:10 schrieb ng0:
>
>>> +       (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
>> I'd keep the original name, but this may be a matter of taste.
> The original file name has some "+something2.tar.gz" in it, I want
> to be consistent with what we provide.
> Or what do you mean?

I suggest keeping te original filename. But I don't know the exacpt
conventions at Guix for this.

> Thanks, I will apply this. They should fix their pypi source (if I got
> it from there). 

ACK.

>>> +    (synopsis "Web user interface for GNU Mailman")
>> Mention "Mailman 3"?
> We only "have" version 3, why should I mention a version then? I
> can do it... Did Mailman prior to version 3 have different
> frontends than version 3?

Mailman 3 is a completely new product. AFAIK most part are re-developed
from scratch. OTOH at http://list.org/ they are just mentioning
"Mailman" and "versions are 2.1.23 … and 3.0.3 …". An at mailman-bundler
[1] they write "This is GNU Mailman" and "This package installs GNU
Mailman".

So probably we should stay with what you did: just call ist "Mailman".

[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mailman-bundler/3.0.0


>
>> Please move it down to the description - I overlooked it first.
> I assume you mean the "Web user interface for GNU Mailman 3".
> In case I haven't mentioned it there, I will do so, okay.

I meant the "synopsis" entry which I expect to be beside the description
and not separate.

-- 
Regards
Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com               |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |


Reply via email to