> I think the most common convention is to use the latest upstream > release, and adding revisions on top of it. But no strong opinion.
> I tried packaging 6.03 a while back and it was very difficult. Most if > the problems seems to be solved here, so thanks for doing this. In general I agree, but I found 6.03 to be hard to package. Maybe I could try again now that something is building, but I expect that it would need additional patches. And 6.03 is very old. > This is unfortunate. The "unittest" target is applied recursively, and > fails with "no such target" in one of the folders. > > However, I was able to successfully run the tests by calling the > "unittest" target "manually" for some reason, like so: Thank you! This works well. > This software bundles some third-party code in the "com32" folder. > libpng@1.2, zlib, and others. Their licenses should be mentioned > here. Preferably they would be scrubbed from the source in favor of > system versions, but that looks to be difficult. Done.
