Am 14.02.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic: > I don't think Guix should do that, though.
I think guix should provide the tools for doing so. Guix has the big advantage of providing trustworthy packages, but kicks itself out of the race if hardening is so much complicated. > IMO locking down everything for users is basically the antithesis of the FSF. The "user" is the company, the employees work on behalf of the company. So the software freedom has to be available toe the company not to the individual employee. As a company I'm expecting the user to *not* install software on their computers (not talking about developers here). Otherwise its like allowing workers to bring their own hammer to the building site or their own machines into the factory building. If the hammer is inappropriate and is deforming all nails, or the machine is producing scrap, the company the the one bear the consequences. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
