On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote: > Hi, > > I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'. > > I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken > (as they are right now). > My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way > where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full > (with all the features you can have enabled)? > > I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with > what we agreed on. >
And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds like opium combined with onion and I don't want that.
