On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:44:12AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > There's also an OpenSSL-1.1.0 related bug which was fixed since the > release of fossil 2.1, reported by Debian: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847556#10
We are still building packages with OpenSSL-1.0.2, so we can ignore this issue for now, right? > I think we should update to at least > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/8c22e1bbcd8ec048 > > I don't know when they plan to release version 2.2, but it will require > a version of sqlite we do not have. Would it be okay to fall back to the > bundled one then? We *should* have sqlite 3.18 after the next core-updates cycle, hopefully by June 15.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
