Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi!
>
> Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Looking into this shared object, I found that it cannot find libjvm.so:
>> $ ldd
>> /gnu/store/q9ad5zvxpm2spiddcj01sw3jkm5vpgva-icedtea-3.5.1/lib/amd64/libnet.so
>> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe355ab000)
>> libdl.so.2 =>
>> /gnu/store/20jhhjzgyqkiw1078cyy3891amqm8d4f-glibc-2.25/lib/libdl.so.2
>> (0x00007f3984931000)
>> libjvm.so => not found
>> libpthread.so.0 =>
>> /gnu/store/20jhhjzgyqkiw1078cyy3891amqm8d4f-glibc-2.25/lib/libpthread.so.0
>> (0x00007f39846f8000)
>> libjava.so =>
>> /gnu/store/q9ad5zvxpm2spiddcj01sw3jkm5vpgva-icedtea-3.5.1/lib/amd64/libjava.so
>> (0x00007f39844cc000)
>> libgcc_s.so.1 =>
>> /gnu/store/0ss2akh5grfdfqnik6mm3lj4yyyb08np-gcc-5.4.0-lib/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
>> (0x00007f39842b4000)
>> libc.so.6 =>
>> /gnu/store/20jhhjzgyqkiw1078cyy3891amqm8d4f-glibc-2.25/lib/libc.so.6
>> (0x00007f3983f15000)
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f3984d4d000)
>> libjvm.so => not found
>> libverify.so =>
>> /gnu/store/q9ad5zvxpm2spiddcj01sw3jkm5vpgva-icedtea-3.5.1/lib/amd64/libverify.so
>> (0x00007f3983d05000)
>> libjvm.so => not found
>
> Oh, bad! :-)
>
> The package has this:
>
> ;; The DSOs use $ORIGIN to refer to each other, but (guix build
> ;; gremlin) doesn't support it yet, so skip this phase.
> #:validate-runpath? #f
>
> The comment was first added in fb799cb72e, when it was true, but shortly
> after (guix build gremlin) gained support for that. So we should
> probably set this to #t once the package is fixed.
>
> Ludo’.
With the patch I submitted earlier today, I tried to set the
#:validate-runpath? to #t, but the build failed.
It seems there are more libraries with linking errors:
$ ldd
/gnu/store/fy8krxbj60z9kx9hwsp4f08qjgr2cb20-icedtea-2.6.11/lib/amd64/xawt/libmawt.so
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc94ed3000)
...
libawt.so => not found
libjava.so => not found
libjvm.so => not found
...
So, again libjvm.so, because this is in different directory.
libmawt.so is used by libjawt.so, (and libjawt.so cannot find libmawt.so
either).
So there's definitely more to investigate/fix here.
Nevertheless, my immediate need is to fix that libjvm.so linkage error
from libjvm.so. So I would like to go ahead with the patch I submitted
earlier.
I am investigating the remaining linkage errors and whether there's a
better fix than creating symbolic links.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
