Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.4K bytes: > ng0 <n...@n0.is> skribis: > > > From cf2cbe9e9e525aa9dd697fcedb255a0fbc194ac9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: ng0 <n...@n0.is> > > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:22:58 +0000 > > Subject: [PATCH] s-shell: Update to commit > > da2e5c20c0c5f477ec3426dc2584889a789b1659. > > > > * gnu/packages/shells.scm (s-shell): Update to commit > > da2e5c20c0c5f477ec3426dc2584889a789b1659. > > (version): Use 'git-version'. > > I adjusted the commit log and pushed.
Why is it [version]? Shouldn't it be (version)? Even though [version] now makes sense, I've seen mostly [] when it followed a () - and that's why I've been using ()[] and never(?) [] on its own. I haven't read HACKING or the chapter 'Contributing' in a while, so you might be describing something that's already in there. If it isn't, does it matter to agree on a fixed grammar for this? I've come to appreciate the strong QA and checks, but what matters is the content of the brackets, not the chosen form of brackets. For ()[] it makes sense. > Thanks! > > Ludo’. > -- GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys WWW: https://n0.is
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
