Hello, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
>> Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> writes: [...] >> (define glibc-final >> ;; The final glibc, which embeds the statically-linked Bash built above. >> - (package (inherit glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash) >> + (package/inherit glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash >> (name "glibc") >> (inputs `(("static-bash" ,static-bash-for-glibc) >> ,@(alist-delete > > We seem to be oscillating on the question of whether to graft these > early GLIBCs. In June 2017, I switched to using 'package/inherit' here > in commit 13f7f2fd2b208c29361ef2290f55911879a6adf2, and in October those > changes were reverted in commit 848f550f2c105326dc3be4033c8aaf35ec21cde4 > by Efraim, although I'm not sure why. I doesn’t make sense to graft “glibc-intermediate” because it’s only used in ‘static-bash-for-glibc’, which statically links against it. The situation is similar with the “-boot0” packages: they are not referenced by the packages we use. So I think 848f550f2c105326dc3be4033c8aaf35ec21cde4 was a good idea. f00b85ff8d34df0a1879e593d4a85629b8586af7 does something similar. Ludo’.