Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-29 13:32 +0200) wrote: > Alex Kost <[email protected]> writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-28 21:25 +0200) wrote: >> >> [...] >>> The update did break “emacs-minimal” and thus all Emacs packages, but >>> that can be fixed by passing “--with-gnutls=no” to emacs-minimal: >> >> I like it! I think '*-minimal' packages should be as minimal as possible. > > “emacs-minimal” already didn’t have gnutls among its inputs, but the > build system now complains about this unless the configure flags make > that explicit to show intent.
Oops, sorry, I didn't pay the required attention to the problem you solved when I wrote that :-) I just thought that 'emacs-minimal' had unneeded 'gnutls' input and you removed it. But now I see, thanks! -- Alex
