Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 1.2K bytes: > > Nils Gillmann <n...@n0.is> writes: > > >> > * libreoffice, because of liborcus: > >> > > >> > checking for MDDS... yes > >> > checking for LIBIXION... no > >> > configure: error: Package requirements (libixion-0.13 >= 0.12.0) were > >> > not met: > >> > > >> > No package 'libixion-0.13' found > >> […] > >> > cannot build derivation > >> > `/gnu/store/4dlhqln57hbb31a519404a7v563yd35c-libreoffice-5.4.6.2.drv': 1 > >> > dependencies couldn't be built > >> > guix package: error: build failed: build of > >> > `/gnu/store/4dlhqln57hbb31a519404a7v563yd35c-libreoffice-5.4.6.2.drv' > >> > failed > >> > >> I don’t think this is right. I’ve upgraded libreoffice a few days ago > >> to version 6.0.x and this included an upgrade of libixion.
Yes, this was ny mistake. I forgot about my out-of-guix-tree libreoffice version in a WIP repository. Libreoffice should be good once I have catched up. > >> Are you sure you’re using the latest version of Guix? If so, do you > >> have GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH set? > > > > Yes, the GPP is set, but my pick for this update of it does not > > include any conflicting package definitions. > > > > I will double check in the next days. > > > > My guix version comes from the normal guix pull, > > version b19950a184a9b7506f9be4ecaa043e5a7e460b52 > > Something is not right here. This commit is much younger than the > commit that upgraded libreoffice > (54179e2463b554ea0b97e0f73d867332b2bf2cee). > > -- > Ricardo >
