Joshua Branson transcribed 1.1K bytes: > Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: > > > Nils Gillmann <n...@n0.is> writes: > > > >> swedebugia transcribed 1.0K bytes: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> I would like to have a continously updated documentation for guix on the > >>> webpage in addition to the release documentation. > >>> > >>> I'm trying to read up on guix and the guix.texi file is hard to handle on > >>> a mobile device and it is quite cumbersome. > >>> > >>> The 0.14 docs are now heavily outdated in my opinion. > >>> -- > >>> Cheers Swedebugia > >> > >> This is due to gnu.org using CVS and with every release we have > >> to upload the documentation by hand. > >> Instead of moving the entire webpage out of gnu.org (which has > >> been proposed before), why not create docs.guixsd.org and > >> use that for updated documentation material? > > > > We have applied for a gnu.org subdomain a couple of weeks ago, but > > progress is slow. The goal is to move to infrastructure that we can > > more easily (and automatically) update. > > May I ask what are some of the other infrastructure options are? > notabug? I'm sure you'll guys will choose a good one, but I'm just curious.
This is about choosing a static webview for the documentation, not a convenience solution which renders them -- which notabug doesn't do by the way. The documentation you view on gnu.org is just checked in into CVS.
