Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
> What do you think of pushing some package updates only to feature > branches that follow a certain naming convention (e.g. “_update-foo” for > updating the “foo” package), which causes Cuirass to build them and > merge the branch into “master” (semi-)automatically when the build is > successful? FWIW I’m all for it, at least for feature updates—security updates should still go directly to master. That’s a bit of work, though. I wonder if we could reuse similar features available in GitLab-style tools. Ludo’.
