Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Just to give you a heads up: four `Oops' fixup-commits later I decided > to squash them again and create a fresh wip-bootstrap: d7feea557. > > I think it could be ready for a rename to core-updates-next. > > $ guix hash -r /gnu/store/y7wy6yr4j19f7d5xlqdln094nivy4cx3-hello-2.10 > 0ab0nazn6v0ybkig9xn58xjk4rqcyanp4wy4rywf32nyl8bgbly5
I finally realised what it really means that the GuixSD bootstrap has `binutils-cross-boot0' (I really think that should be reflected in the SCM name too?) and `gcc-cross-boot0': bolting the x86_64-linux bootstrap onto the i686-linux Mes bootstrap proved to be "almost" trivial (very low hanging fruit I think whas wat Ludovic said). So, I took the freedom to add another commit onto wip-bootstrap that also replaces the x86_64-linux bootstrap. I realise that this commit may have its own problems; so when moving to core-updates-next we may want to be a bit careful before taking it in. Greetings, janneke
