Hello Laura, Laura Lazzati <laura.lazzati...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 28., V, 2:52): > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:06 PM Ricardo Wurmus > <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Laura, > > > > >> > > I would like you to come up with an initial proposal, and then > > >> > > iterate on that. > > >> > Ok, I have the initial Outreachy project next to me. I will take a > > >> > look at everything there, and write down a proposal, during the > > >> > following days, WDYT? > > >> > > >> Ok, that would be great. > > > I have one last question: do I need to follow a specific format? > > > ie: a template or just writing down in plain text: > > > From date/week number up to date/week number: and a TODO list of tasks? > > > > Plain text is fine. It only needs to clearly communicate your intent. > Sorry, I wrote some ideas in the discussion thread about the videos. > I have one last question about the timeline: > How much in depth I need to detail what I am thinking of doing each > week/s? Is it ok writing a general idea, > For example: > Week 1: learn the necessary concepts about video creation, and tools I > will be using > Week 2: work on the video/s about packaging (for example, as it is one > mentioned on the Oureachy website) > Or does it have to be more detailed?
I prefer to see an outline first, not very much detalied, and when the need arises some parts can be refined. When there is a timeline, it is good to see what the time estimates are based on. One way to do that is to break down a task, as time requirements of smaller tasks are easier to estimate, but there are other ways. So I don't think we need a much more detailed timeline initially, but it would be nice if you could point out what your time estimates are based on. If anyone is confused about a point in the outline, or would like to see more details, then that can be refined. WDYT? > Regards! > > > > -- > > Ricardo > Laura Best regards, g_bor
