Hello!
>> [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >Lesson learned: we should not rely at all on generated patches because >they are bound to change frequently (version string at the end, length >of commit hash prefixes, etc.) It’s probably worse than tarballs >generated by Git hosting services. > >So we should probably work towards using local copies of patches, >unless >we find that the generated patches do not include any variable bits. > Maybe we could pass the patches through some sanitizer to strip any metadata? I guess the content itself shouldn't change? Maxim
