n...@n0.is writes:
> Let's not drop an architecture because occasionally something breaks for > it. breakage is bad, yes. but it's more than just the broken packages. > it is the way patches find their way into master. if you have more > patience then I had, you can try to address the workflow in guix (there > will be some past discussions you can find on the mailinglists). > > I've been on the high-friction lane with GuixSD, so I am talking from > experience and not just assumptions. I don’t understand what you are alluding to. Could you please elaborate? Could you translate this into concrete suggestions or expectations? -- Ricardo
