Hello, [email protected] skribis:
> commit 375cb94130b222535ad7c7e0fa0d212483407351 > Author: Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Mar 26 13:37:07 2019 +0100 > > gnu: wesnoth: Rename package to the-battle-for-wesnoth. > commit c91ed484d0b66d5639ba01f9ba301ff762d9170d > Author: Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Mar 26 13:35:16 2019 +0100 > > gnu: abbaye: Rename package to l-abbaye-des-morts. Apologies if I missed a previous discussion on this topic, but… I’m skeptical about the renames. I assume that the original names were those commonly used in distributions, which in itself may be a good reason to keep them. Those names are also used upstream in some cases: the tarball for wesnoth is called “westnoth*.tar.gz”, for example, and the GitHub project of L’Abbaye des morts is “abbayedesmorts” (no ‘l’). Like our naming guidelines say (info "(guix) Package Naming"), we should try to stick to the upstream name. Thoughts? Ludo’.
