Hello, Laura Lazzati <laura.lazzati...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. ápr. 1., H, 20:02): > > Hi Paul! > > > > I have finished updating the transcripts and I am preparing to do the > > recordings tomorrow. > Great! Could you remind me in UTC at which time of the day? Because I > generally have to record them at 00 UTC to reduce the environmental > noise. And then match them. > > > > One question about the makefile: am I right in thinking that the > > makefile automatically adjusts the duration of each slide according to > > the duration of the corresponding audio file? In other words it would > > not matter if I supply audio files that are slightly longer (or > > shorter) than your originals? > Yes, the slides videos take the duration of the audio file. And the > cli session videos, let me check, but they are easier in terms that > you have to say what is said during while listening to the audio, to > match the command. > > > > > Shouldn't the 'guix environment' step be later in the list of steps? > > > If I was packaging the aspi package I would do: > > > > > > $ guix environment --pure r-aspi > > > The environment was set up in the first packaging video. As far as I > > > am concerned, the idea is to have a clean guix environment and > > > package > > > everything there. If you are using a foreign distro then I believe > > > that it could not be reproducible if you package it first. > > > Please, let the others correct me if I am wrong. > > > > I think that this question has to do with the complexity of the > > package. The aspi example is a simple case that does not have any > > dependencies outside the R build system. For a more complex package > > (newPackage, for example) using: > > > > $ guix environment --pure guix > > $ guix build newPackage > > > > would fail if newPackage has extra inputs. Instead, the commands > > should be: > > > > $ guix environment --pure newPackage > > $ guix build newPackage > > > > I think this would be easy to communicate to new users if steps 1 and 2 > > are switched on Slide 2 and I add some extra words to the transcript. > > > > Do you (and others) agree? > When I packaged, I did it the other way, and my mentors approved them. > Recall that you are "touching" .scm files from your the guix you have > installed if you do it the other way around. But if the others can > shed some light it would be great. In case I am wrong, I would need to > change not only the slides but also the cli sessions :/. In that case, > could you reschedule the day for the recordings? >
Sorry, I am late to the party. To clarify things, the following is happening here: 1. at first guix is built from source, in a guix environment guix 2. the package is added 3. the package build is tested using pre-inst-env guix build package So, the environment is not for r-aspi, but to get to the exact environment where the pre-inst-env was built, so the third step is reproducible. Does that make sense? > Regards :) > Laura Best regards, g_bor
