Oh, I meant to ask: On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Vollmert <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi all, Timothy, > > Cool! I’m in the process of looking everything over. In the meantime, > I have some early questions and comments. > >> I’ve incorporated your comments, and removed >> ghc-packedstring. In addition, the branch incorporates some other >> patchsets: >> >> #36493: updating GHC-included haskell dependencies (this one is already >> in core-updates) > > I think it makes sense to wait for the core-updates merge (which > shouldn’t be too far out).
Why? Shouldn’t substitutes be available since CI built the branch successfully?
