Jesse,Thanks! It was linked from another thread[0] Ludo' pasted to my patch, though. I've read both.
Jesse Gibbons 写道：
Here's a post with what I think is a good argument against adding /usr/bin/env. I think the standard patch-shebang phase does a good job at preventing the potential issue, but the argument still applies to
So is the argument here that Guix packages would generate scripts at run-time that refer to /usr/bin/env? Or just that it's currently easy to catch packages that install #!/usr/bin/env scripts? Or something else?
Neither /bin/sh nor /usr/bin/env are available in the build environment. Relying on the *likely* run-time non-existence of /usr/bin/env in *user* environments to catch *packaging* bugs does not sound acceptable to me.
scripts generated by make, as I learned while attempting to port pysolfc.
If you have the time, could you elaborate? Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35910
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
