Hello, Timothy Sample <[email protected]> writes:
> We already have “hspec-discover” without the “ghc” prefix. The two > packages look identical to me – is this an unintentional copy? Oh! I hadn't noticed! Well, is there any strong reason to use "hspec-discover" over "ghc-hspec-discover", besides that it already exists? For the arguments in favor of using ghc-hspec-discover: - every other "hspec" package uses the "ghc-" prefix, - the hackage importer names it, - the hackage importer will add "ghc-hspec-discover" as an input anyway. So what about deprecating "hspec-discover" in favor of "ghc-hspec-discover"? Thanks for the heads up! Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
