Efraim Flashner writes:
> On March 11, 2020 4:20:26 PM UTC, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Efraim Flashner writes:
>>
>>> If you're using gcc-7 as the bootstrap gcc for the Hurd then IMO you
>>> should go ahead and either use gcc-7 or gcc for the libstdc++-boot0
>>
>>Ah...your patch but then with gcc-7 instead of gcc-5; gosh why didn't I
>>think of that. Thank you!
>>
>>I'll give that a try...although that patch won't get in, in its current
>>form, right? We'd have to think of some solution...
>>
>>janneke
>>
>
> For new architectures it can go in, but there's no actual need for it
> for aarch64
Tried to try this
(define libstdc++-boot0
;; GCC's libcc1 is always built as a shared library (the top-level
;; 'Makefile.def' forcefully adds --enable-shared) and thus needs to refer
;; to libstdc++.so. We therefore use a version of GCC which most closely
;; matches the bootstrap compiler of that architecture.
(let ((lib (make-libstdc++
(match (warn 'CS: (or (%current-target-system)
(%current-system)))
("i586-gnu" gcc-7)
(_ gcc-4.9)))))
overnight, but I realised that this diversification does not work; CS is
still x86_64-linux here when cross building for the Hurd.
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
