Hi Ricardo, On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:09:26 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Danny Milosavljevic <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:58:42 +0200 > > Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> (If anyone knows how to get ‘a.syntax-symbol’ CSS different from just > >> ‘a’, I’m all ears!) > […] > > a.syntax-symbol { > > color: red; > > } > > a:not(.syntax-symbol) { > > background-color: blue; > > } > > The first definition would suffice if it came after any style definition > for just “a”. Yeah, but the behavior would be different. I thought Ludo meant that he wanted the rules for just "a" not to apply to "a.syntax-symbol". With your version the rules for just "a" and the ones for "a.syntax-symbol" would totally both apply to "a.syntax-symbol"s. In my version, the "with class" text doesn't have a blue background. In yours, it would have. (I'd agree that it's often overkill)
pgpZPuX_9zw1u.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
