Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> writes:

> Marius Bakke <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On a related note, the 'ccl' package has a similar issue, and actually
>> produces an invalid derivation on aarch64 and armhf.  It can be seen by
>> running e.g. 'guix weather -s armhf-linux'.  I've been meaning to file a
>> bug about it forever, but typically just comment the package and forget
>> about it.  :-/
>
> I don't understand why the `ccl' package would have an invalid
> derivation on armhf-linux: All `match' seem to be correct, but I can't
> test at the moment.  Are you sure this is a similar issue?

Admittedly it's only tangentially related.  It is really easy to test by
running 'guix build -s armhf-linux --no-grafts -d ccl'.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to