zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 23:41, Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> wrote: > >> Missing fonts in the manual is another known issue and was not clear >> from your initial message: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/41418>. > > My initial message was on <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/41282> and > not on #41418; I have never commented on.
Oh, your most recent messages appeared below the fontconfig patch thread on guix-devel in my MUA, so I did not make the mental link to #41282. > I do not understand why you are saying "missing font in the manual" > because I have the fonts installed; especially font-dejavu (and > gs-fonts too). The missing fonts were in images (PNG files) embedded in the manual, so it does not matter what you have installed: they are not rendered when you open the .png, unlike e.g. SVG or a rich text document. > Well, I do not understand neither how c81457a588 can work nicely and > not 23a59b180b with the exact same setup, if nothing has changed in > regard to font between these 2 parent commits of the last merge. The difference is that Pango (and its consumers) did not recognize the built-in fallback font in fontconfig which was previously 'gs-fonts', now changed to 'font-dejavu'.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
