Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> writes: > Agreed, or perhaps 'emacs' itself should have been updated on a separate > branch.
+1 for WIP-emacs branch in future. Brett Gilio
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27.1. Brett Gilio
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27... Jack Hill
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27... Amin Bandali
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update t... Mark H Weaver
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Upda... Ludovic Courtès
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: ... Mark H Weaver
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: em... Ludovic Courtès
- Re: [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27.1. Mark H Weaver
- Re: [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27.1. Morgan Smith
- Re: [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27.1. Mark H Weaver
- Re: [bug#42738] [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Upda... Brett Gilio
- Re: [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27.1. Giovanni Biscuolo
- Re: [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27.1. Pierre Neidhardt
- Re: [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27.1. Pierre Neidhardt
- Re: [PATCH v4] gnu: emacs: Update to 27... Giovanni Biscuolo
