On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:25, Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:
>
> zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > It appears to me more logical to name it: emacs-xelb-no-x-toolkit;
> > appending the variation last.
>
> Depends how you look at it ;)  But I don't have a strong opinion.

Me neither.  Just it seems more consistent:
 1. with how "guix search" works (see 'relevance')
and 2. with the description which says "`emacs-xelb' is a pure Emacs
Lisp [...]".

Cheers,
simon

Reply via email to