On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:25, Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> wrote: > > zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes: > > > It appears to me more logical to name it: emacs-xelb-no-x-toolkit; > > appending the variation last. > > Depends how you look at it ;) But I don't have a strong opinion.
Me neither. Just it seems more consistent: 1. with how "guix search" works (see 'relevance') and 2. with the description which says "`emacs-xelb' is a pure Emacs Lisp [...]". Cheers, simon