Luciana Lima Brito <lubr...@posteo.net> writes: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:10:01 +0000 > Luciana Lima Brito <lubr...@posteo.net> wrote: > >> > Maybe add another procedure that combines group-to-alist but >> > generates an alist with vectors as the values? >> > (group-to-alist/vector maybe). > > I did it! :) > It was so much simpler. I created a function > group-to-alist/vector, based on the previous function, to which I added > the map I was already using on the controller.scm for data-groups. > > (define (group-to-alist/vector process lst) > (map > (match-lambda > ((label args ...) > `(,label . ,(list->vector args)))) > (group-to-alist process lst))) > > The only change needed on the html.scm is to use vector->list in the > items, like this > > (map > (lambda (alist) > ... > (or (vector->list items) '())) > > Please, tell me what you think is the best, this way or the other that > I sent earlier with the patch?
Great :) I'd go with this approach, applying the comments I made about the match-lambda bit above in the email I sent a few minutes ago.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
